Smilin' Jack


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Smilin' Jack   » Specific Airline Discussions   » American Airlines   » BA Might Scoop Up 2nd Ranked AA (Page 1)

 
This topic is comprised of pages:  1  2 
 
Author Topic: BA Might Scoop Up 2nd Ranked AA
Irish
Post Captain
Member # 722

Icon 7 posted      Profile for Irish     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Check out this comment from Barron's Weekly...

"Barron's said analysts expect British Airways to generate an operating profit of $350 million, or $2.20 per share, in the year starting next March, and may earn up to $3 per share. British Airways has cut $1.5 billion in costs over the last year, including 10,000 jobs, with another 3,000 jobs slated to be slashed this year, Barron's said.

Barron's said in some ways, the Ryanairs of the world pose the biggest threat to traditional carriers.

By imitating Southwest's no-frills approach, insisting that passenger booking be done on the Internet, and scheduling flights subsidized by local businesses and organizations eager for tourism, Ryanair has become Europe's leading low-cost carrier, generating profits in each of the last 13 years, Barron's said.

Such competition has stung British Airways, which has also been hurt by SARS, the Iraq war, terrorism and sluggish U.S. and European economies. It posted a $105 million fiscal first quarter loss as revenue fell 11 percent from a year earlier, and saw its debt cut to "junk" status by ratings agency Standard & Poor's.

But British Airways is fighting back, Barron's said, and it now conducts nearly 50 percent of economy class bookings online.

Meanwhile, an analyst for a large British Airways investor told Barron's she expects premium travel to rebound faster than expected, with British Airways gaining business as other carriers cut capacity.

In addition, as some ailing carriers fold, British Airways might be in a position to buy such second-ranked airlines as Aer Lingus, Finnair Oyj, Spain's Iberia Airlines and perhaps even AMR Corp.'s American Airlines Inc., Barron's said."

Don cha just love it! AA, a second-rank carrier. Now let's see, all APA pilots will be stapled to the bottom of the BA pilot's list, yada, yada, yada. The nAAtives file suit in Federal Court protesting the seniority integration. [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin] ...What goes around, comes around!

Posts: 1634 | From: Hampton, NH  |  IP: Logged
L1011Ret
Post Captain
Member # 1792

Icon 1 posted      Profile for L1011Ret   Email L1011Ret   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Its AA karma...It would be Fair as Carty said.
Posts: 416  |  IP: Logged
upsilon
Post Captain
Member # 78

Icon 1 posted      Profile for upsilon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ain't gonna happen unless you call 25% of the stock a "scoop"; or unless the law is changed to allow greater foreign ownership.

Wishful thinking!

Posts: 74 | From: NYC  |  IP: Logged
gambit3131
Post Captain
Member # 261

Icon 1 posted      Profile for gambit3131   Author's Homepage   Email gambit3131   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Barron's Article

quote:
That will happen eventually, if only because the costs of propping up ailing airlines will start to balloon out of sight. As the shakeout starts, BA could be in a prime position to both buy second-ranked airlines like Iberia, Aer Lingus and Finnair and maybe even American Airlines.
I don't see how they could buy AA. As Upsilon stated, they could only buy 25%. ??

gambit

Posts: 176 | From: Fort Worth, TX  |  IP: Logged
Kenneth
Post Captain
Member # 259

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Kenneth   Author's Homepage   Email Kenneth   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Isn't the foreign-ownership issue a key item in the US-EU negotiations going on now? If I remember correctly, while the US was pushing for open skies, the EU was pushing for (a) rights to fly and accept passengers in-between US cities and (b) an increase in the foreign ownership %. There was some comment in USA Today (can't remember the date?) by one of the US negotiators, stating that the US may be willing to go up to 49%, but didn't want to go above that due to national security concerns.

On a 2nd note ... Richard Branson was on CNN this weekend, talking about plans to launch Virgin-America (?) by the end of 2004. He talked about the ownership rules briefly, said he'd rather get in the game now, even if it means a US equity partner, rather than wait for the rules to change.

Ken

Posts: 160 | From: Philadelphia, PA  |  IP: Logged
keho
Junior Poster
Member # 2258

Icon 1 posted      Profile for keho         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Gambit: Foreign entities can hold up to 49% in a US airline. The 25% rule applies only to the voting rights.
Chances are that at the very least foreign ownership of voting stock will be increased to 49% in the not so distant future. (See here)
Personally, I would welcome a complete lift of foreign ownership restriction - if we had had this 3 years ago, I guarantee you, TWA would still proudly fly its colors.

Back to the AA/BA deal: It is no secret that there have been several discussions between the two about the possibility of a full-blown merger. They already came close twice. Only recently, in the wake of the AF-KLM merger, BA reiterated their intent to pursue this option if anyhow feasible. I would not be surprised at all to see such a deal as an outcome of the on-going US/EU open-skies negotiations. If this happens, I could think of a good company logo that would symbolize the Old and the New World, with great worldwide brand recognition, and a name that, unlike British-American Tobacco, would not have any national reference. Maybe you guys can think of one too ...

Posts: 12 | From: Brooklyn, NY  |  IP: Logged
B-757-200
Post Captain
Member # 430

Icon 1 posted      Profile for B-757-200   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The best, most satisfying scenario would be for BA to acquire 49% of AA, then ground all AA 777s/767s and replace ALL of AA's int'l flying with BA planes/crews.

THAT would be poetic justice, and most certainly
'fair'. [Wink]

Posts: 1278 | From: Los Angeles,Ca,USA  |  IP: Logged
donuway
Post Captain
Member # 803

Icon 1 posted      Profile for donuway   Email donuway   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
KEHO,

So what you are saying is that BA would only have to buy about what,,,20% of AA, and any rights that still may go with the name brand that AMR has in the closet? [Wink]

I still say SW needs an International Brand. What in the world do they do with all of that money that they keep making? Don't you think the purchasing guy/gal gets tired of calling Boeing and saying "Yep, 10 more 737s, just like the last ones"? [Razz]

Don

Posts: 414 | From: St. Louis, Mo  |  IP: Logged
nyc6035
Post Captain
Member # 423

Icon 1 posted      Profile for nyc6035     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Keho,

Let's see, old and new, name recognition, not linked to any one nationality...hmm...let's see...Trans Continental...no...Trans Oceanic...no I think that was the name of a carrier in a movie once...World Airways..no that's taken...World Transport Airlines...no...it's on the tip of my tong...I'll keep working on it...you guys have any ideas...I feel I'm really getting close here...

Posts: 281 | From: Chappaqua, NY  |  IP: Logged
AHP
Post Captain
Member # 1710

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AHP     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by B-757-200:
The best, most satisfying scenario would be for BA to acquire 49% of AA, then ground all AA 777s/767s and replace ALL of AA's int'l flying with BA planes/crews.

Best and most satisfying for who? Why only international flying, why not domestic also. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. Time to move on and get a career and new mindset of any kind. This economy is the pits. Brother in law, mother in law, best friend, and neighbor all looking for work..
Posts: 80  |  IP: Logged
AAflyingbrian67
Post Captain
Member # 2419

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AAflyingbrian67   Email AAflyingbrian67   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I understand that most TWA employees hate AA. I understand that TWA employees hate the unions on the grounds of AA. I also understand that they do not trust AA management. Most TWA employees wish AA had never bought TWA. What has happened to TWA in the past 2.5 years is sad. But, is it the fault of EVERY employee at AA?

It seems that many TWA employees want to see the employees at AA go through the same pain that they went through? Lets think about one thing for a minute! It was management and union officals that decided what happen to TWA. It was not the ticket agent or the janitor or even the 2 year f/a that decided what was going on.

If the unions win their law suit and f/as and pilots come back with their full seniorty do you still want BA to ground our 777/767 and fly all of your international flights?????

Posts: 48 | From: Miami  |  IP: Logged
Bill Sherrod
Post Captain
Member # 418

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bill Sherrod   Email Bill Sherrod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by AAflyingbrian67:
I understand that most TWA employees hate AA. I understand that TWA employees hate the unions on the grounds of AA. I also understand that they do not trust AA management. Most TWA employees wish AA had never bought TWA. What has happened to TWA in the past 2.5 years is sad. But, is it the fault of EVERY employee at AA?

It seems that many TWA employees want to see the employees at AA go through the same pain that they went through? Lets think about one thing for a minute! It was management and union officals that decided what happen to TWA. It was not the ticket agent or the janitor or even the 2 year f/a that decided what was going on.

If the unions win their law suit and f/as and pilots come back with their full seniorty do you still want BA to ground our 777/767 and fly all of your international flights?????

Lemme think about that one...

"...We fu$#ed you because we could..." Ed White, APA merger committee.

"...no career expectations...legitimate captain..."

"...TWA pilots are like K-Mart pilots and AA pilots are like Nordstrom pilots..."

"...You should be thankful to have a job..."

"...Fair and equitable integration..."

and my all time favorite, "...Two Great Airlines, ONE Great Future..."

OK, I thought about it. AA can vanish from the face of the earth for all I care.

Bill

Posts: 266 | From: FL  |  IP: Logged
AAflyingbrian67
Post Captain
Member # 2419

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AAflyingbrian67   Email AAflyingbrian67   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Bill- Once again because a few people made those nasty remarks every employee at AA should have to pay the price??
Posts: 48 | From: Miami  |  IP: Logged
B-757-200
Post Captain
Member # 430

Icon 1 posted      Profile for B-757-200   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Brian, forgive me for being cynical, because you've been a civil poster, but 'Turnabout is fair play'. Agreed?

What happened to TWA and her 22,000 employees is the most destructive, most inequitable, most career-ending, most one-sided and most reprehensible (even criminal!) 'integration' in airline labor HISTORY.

No, it's not your fault or any one individual at AA; but, what did you/they do while many thousands of more senior, more experienced and longer veteran TWA employees were getting furloughed while you kept your job?

Posts: 1278 | From: Los Angeles,Ca,USA  |  IP: Logged
AAflyingbrian67
Post Captain
Member # 2419

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AAflyingbrian67   Email AAflyingbrian67   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I am just tired of the hate! Its getting old very fast! Yes what happen to TWA employees was not good. It is not the outcome that the 20,000 employees thought would happen to them.

I have worked at AA for 17 years and I am not happy here! The union sold us down the river and I cannot trust management! So what are my options? leave or fight to make things better?

TWA employees feel that they were not treated fare! You have the same two options. Leave or fight! I know that the TWA f/as are fighting! I am sure the rest of the TWA employees are fighting too.

What ever out come is, someone is not going to be happy. If TWA win their lawsuit they will be brought back and 4000 OTHER f/as will be put out on the street. These 4000 f/as have families just like TWA f/as, sick kids just like TWA employees etc.... See not matter what happens people are going to get screwed! So someone please tell me what is the right answer?

What about the TWA employees that left TWA to come over to AA and start over? They saw the writing on the wall?

I have said on many chat rooms and on this BB that MOST TWA employees got screwed! That they should have got SOME kind of seniorty! I have gotten hate email from AA crews saying I am a A++ for saying that.....

Now I get on this BB and I read that many want AA to fail like TWA! They want 100,000 employees to be out on the street! Many of those 100,000 had nothing to do with AA BUYING TWA!

AA should have never bought TWA! We cannot change that!

Posts: 48 | From: Miami  |  IP: Logged
Skyyggoddess
Junior Poster
Member # 2526

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Skyyggoddess   Email Skyyggoddess   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Brian's right on this one. What happened to the employees at TWA is a shame. I have no doubt that AMR lied to the TWA employees (they lie to everyone, so this is not hard to believe.) Wishing evil on all of us at AAL makes you no better than the people who pulled the fast ones on you.
I truly hope that however it happens, that good will come out of this for all TWA people. I know there is a lot of suffering going on and corrupt people brought you to this point. You have a right to be mad, but you know what...Brian didn't do this to you...In fact, if AMR and most of APFA had decent people like Brian, your life would be different right now.
Terry
IDF

Posts: 3  |  IP: Logged
AAflyingbrian67
Post Captain
Member # 2419

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AAflyingbrian67   Email AAflyingbrian67   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks Terry!

Brian

Posts: 48 | From: Miami  |  IP: Logged
Skyyggoddess
Junior Poster
Member # 2526

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Skyyggoddess   Email Skyyggoddess   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
TWA member 430 (your quote below)
"No, it's not your fault or any one individual at AA; but, what did you/they do while many thousands of more senior, more experienced and longer veteran TWA employees were getting furloughed while you kept your job?"
quote:

Now, to answer your question...I took an overage leave for almost 2 years (NO PAY during that entire time) so that you would not be furloughed. Thousands of us did that, TWA member 430, and furthermore, because of my seniority (I'm senior) I always knew that someone at TWA was still flying because my husband made a decent salary that afforded me to be able to take off. Please don't say that all of us on OL's were only doing this for AAL F/A's...it just ain't so.
You know, TWA member 430, if I could, I would take an OL again and maybe it would be you that would be flying. That would be great, because I don't have ulterior motive...just trying to help someone, anyone less fortunate than I.

Posts: 3  |  IP: Logged
B-757-200
Post Captain
Member # 430

Icon 1 posted      Profile for B-757-200   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Now, now, Ms.SkyGoddess, I was'nt implying that ALL AA employees were at fault. It's just that AA management, the unions and MOST members were all too indifferent (and unconcerned) when the slaughter befell the VERY senior, experienced TWA employee group, since noone objected. Without the TWA buyout, AA would have most certainly furloughed 2500+ pilots and 5000+ F/As of it's OWN right after 9-11 (with no 'seniority' cushion to protect junior, new-hire AA employees).

I'm sure your motives were pure, and I hope you enjoyed your leave. Thanks for your sentiment, but over 1600 pilots would have to retire/resign/takeleave before I got recalled. Won't happen in this decade.

(Unless the lawsuit suceeds, of course.)

Posts: 1278 | From: Los Angeles,Ca,USA  |  IP: Logged
Skyyggoddess
Junior Poster
Member # 2526

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Skyyggoddess   Email Skyyggoddess   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
TWA 430,
I'll try to overlook your condescension.
Terry

Posts: 3  |  IP: Logged
AHP
Post Captain
Member # 1710

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AHP     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by B-757-200:

No, it's not your fault or any one individual at AA; but, what did you/they do while many thousands of more senior, more experienced and longer veteran TWA employees were getting furloughed while you kept your job?

I keep seeing your more senior, more experienced veterans theme. I assume you are on lay off with your bitter attitude (which by the way, I would not wish on anyone). How many years did you have with TWA and what do you consider experienced. Please don't answer by bashing others that you consider inexperienced. Sometimes it is healthier to just move on with your life and learn from your adversities.
Posts: 80  |  IP: Logged
AAflyingbrian67
Post Captain
Member # 2419

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AAflyingbrian67   Email AAflyingbrian67   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
At American Airlines things are not going well. The company is in debt 20 million and we have laid off over 25,000 employees. Many employees are thinking about the future. Many like myself are thinking about the "what if".
Many, Many, employees are going back to school or looking for new jobs. We are not sure what the future holds for AA and we do not want to be ill prepared if AA goes under.

Like I have stated many times in this site that I feel sorry for the TWA employees. TWA was in trouble for years. Now that many TWA employees are on the street I wonder why many were not prepared for this?

A good friend of mine told me that the day she heard AA bought TWA she was so happy because for years she was worried about the security of her job at TWA. I know that feeling did not last long but, I wonder why so many were not "prepared" I am not even sure if someone can prepare for losing your job after so many years. I am not making fun or kicking someone when they are down. I am just wondering???

Posts: 48 | From: Miami  |  IP: Logged
AAflyingbrian67
Post Captain
Member # 2419

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AAflyingbrian67   Email AAflyingbrian67   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
sorry that should read that AA is in debt 20 BILLION!
Posts: 48 | From: Miami  |  IP: Logged
G4G5
Post Captain
Member # 813

Icon 1 posted      Profile for G4G5     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
BA should take an equity stake in AA. It makes perfect sense. BA could take a 25% stake in AA (very similar to what KLM did to NWA in the early 90's). This would provide AA with approx $600-550 in cash (based upon a market cap of approx $2.3 billion).

This would also provide AA with a cash influx that would allow it to refinance it's debt to lower interest levels, further solidifying AA financial numbers.

In turn BA would almost certianly see a stock price rise with the lowering of the debt ratio. A stock price of $18+ would provide BA with a 50% ROI in approx a year. No bad.

Once the debt has been refianaced AA would have the necessary cash to purchase ERJ's, the Pacific, whatever.

Let's face facts Alliances are a necessary evil and if anything were to happen to AA, BA would instantly become the ugly girl at the dance (no US alliance partner). This does not interst BA at all.

For the same reason I think that Lufthansa will be forced to take an equity position in UAL. Without an influx of cash UAL will not be able to come up with the necesary cash to exit BK. Lufthansa has a vested interest in UAL's survival, just like BA has with AA.

Posts: 275 | From: New York  |  IP: Logged
IanW
twa
Member # 2186

Icon 1 posted      Profile for IanW   Email IanW   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I would like to add another perspective here, I worked for TWA for 31 years in the International Division. It was a wonderful life up to the last few years. TWA Inc. did not care one bit about their employees in the international division. Look at what they did to FCO, MXP, LIS, BCN, MAD, TLV. They closed these stations and then renaged on their legal responabilities with regards to pensions etc.
I fought for TW to the end and also bought into Captian Bill's Vision 2000 program as a lead facilitator.
I had the luck to be transferred to TWA LLC and when, through integration, my position was eliminated AA paid me a redundacy payment far above the legal requirement of the UK. I "retired" under the 50/55 rule and next year become an AA retiree for travel benefits.....
I can only say THANKS AA....
The management of TWA Inc, a company I loved and was proud of screwed us.... For those of us in International lucky enough to transfer to LLC, if only for a short period, AA was a godsend...

Posts: 39 | From: Frankfurt Germany  |  IP: Logged
TWA Fan 1
Post Captain
Member # 1926

Icon 1 posted      Profile for TWA Fan 1   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ian W:

I'm glad you're happy with the way you've been treated by AA since the acquisition.

But to point the finger at TWA for the way the international station staff has been treated is not at all accurate.

Previous to TWA being acquired by AA, TWA was largely maintaining its obligations to its E.U. located station staff.

As part of the acquisition, AA insisted on TWA filing for liquidation to eliminate any liabilities to Carl Icahn and side liabilities such as the E.U. station staffs.

And how do you feel about the way AA treated the Tel Aviv station staff?

Finally, the only reason you have anything is because of U.K. law. Don't you think that without those laws you would be in the same predicament as your Stateside colleagues, many of whom have worked for TWA as long as you and now find themselves out on the street with no severance, no pension, no medical insurance, and two-year seniority rights?

Instead they've been told to apply for Missouri unemployment compensation, which in some cases is paying as little as $200/month (since they were all assigned to the STL base many of them are not able to apply for unemployment compensation in their real States of residence and work).

Posts: 400 | From: Brooklyn, NY  |  IP: Logged
IanW
twa
Member # 2186

Icon 1 posted      Profile for IanW   Email IanW   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Italy, Spain and Portugal were closed long before the AA deal, and TWA Inc. did not meet their legal obligations in these countries.
With regard to UK law, AA paid far more than they were legaly required to. The UK has the weakest employee protection laws in the EU.
TLV was closed by TWA inc who stopped flying overnight and threw the employees out on the street. That AA did not choose to purchase this "asset" is another question.
What AA has done to the TWA emplyees in the US is shameful, without question. The point I wanted to make was that TWA in treated its employees in the international division no better.
It was the people of TWA that made it a great airline and a great place to work and we were all sold down the river.

Posts: 39 | From: Frankfurt Germany  |  IP: Logged
TWA Fan 1
Post Captain
Member # 1926

Icon 1 posted      Profile for TWA Fan 1   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ian W:

Concerning Italy, Spain and Portugal I don't dispute that the pre-acquisition TWA didn't meet all its obligations there. Not to justify what happened there, but the obligations were quite onerous. And once AA acquired TWA they did nothing to fill the gap there.

Certainly, TWA treated its Rome, Milan, Madrid, Barcelona, and Lisbon station personnel better than AA has treated its TWA LLC personnel at STL, where the only benefit is paid for by the State of Missouri.

Again, your TWA colleagues, many of whom worked as long or longer than you, received no severance, no medical benefits, no pension, and, of course, two-year seniority rights.

Oh, I forgot, they were all referred to a couple of websites to look for new jobs.

Incidentally, had AA allowed TWA LLC personnel to remain at the various other domestic stations (JFK, PHL, LAX, SFO, etc.) AA would have been liable for the unemployment insurance its furloughed employees would have received in those states (all of which pay higher benefits than Missouri) in the form of increased unemployment insurance rates. And that would have ended up costing AMR much more money.

As far as Tel Aviv goes, the firings there occurred after the acquisition was put in motion (although before it was finalized) and at AA's behest.

And in the U.K. AA may have exceeded its legal obligations but the reason is that AA was very desirous of forming a close alliance with BA and did not want to land in hot water with the British Govt. and public opinion.

Posts: 400 | From: Brooklyn, NY  |  IP: Logged
IanW
twa
Member # 2186

Icon 1 posted      Profile for IanW   Email IanW   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
TWA Fan 1...
I guess we differ in our view on this. My feelings for the way TWA left the business are more ones of sadness than bitterness. TWA had a proud history in the International arena, and I am very proud to have been a part of that history. As I said before, the people of TWA made it what it was.
As a management employee at Intl. Div HQ during this period I think I have a better perspective of what was happening from the beginning of 2000 to the end in April 2001. I just wanted to try and balance the picture a bit. I am aware that the majority of people on this site were US based emplyees and can fully understand their feellings about the way they were, and still are being treated. Whatever AA's motives were in the UK they are no longer important to me.
As a tail end to this, I was invited to attend the Vision 2000 wrap in STL on 17 Novemebr 2000 where Capt. Compton praised our efforts and told us that we were instrumental in ensuring TWA's future. Less than 8 weeks later TWA was talking bankruptcy and liquidation.
None of this will take away the wonderful memories of the many many good years and the very many great people I had the privilage to work with on both sides of the Atlantic

Posts: 39 | From: Frankfurt Germany  |  IP: Logged
TWA Fan 1
Post Captain
Member # 1926

Icon 1 posted      Profile for TWA Fan 1   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I am clearly a big supporter of TWA, but let's face it, losing money for 13 years in a row was not easy. The costs of the international stations, which made sense in the old days, were a big drag on the finances of a broken-down company with no cash on hand.

At the end TWA didn't always do what it should have, we agree. But the reason is that it really just didn't have the resources any more.

As far as AA goes, yes they have lost a lot of money in the past 2 years ($6+ billion) and they have a huge debt load. But they could much more easily afford to do the right thing for their furloughed employees at STL than TWA ever could. And the bottom line is they really did basically nothing.

They allowed TWA people to put on their TWA uniforms on Halloween and then gave them the names of a couple of websites so they could look up jobs available in places like Borders Book and Starbucks.

That was it: No severance, no medical benefits, no pension, two-year seniority rights. This for people who had as much and more seniority than you.

I'm sure you don't support that.

[ 11-03-2003, 12:41: Message edited by: TWA Fan 1 ]

Posts: 400 | From: Brooklyn, NY  |  IP: Logged
IanW
twa
Member # 2186

Icon 1 posted      Profile for IanW   Email IanW   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Of course I dont support that. I spent a lot of time in STL, both at the airport and 1CC. Nobody deserved what has happened.
Posts: 39 | From: Frankfurt Germany  |  IP: Logged
chrispy
Post Captain
Member # 2242

Icon 1 posted      Profile for chrispy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Should the TWA employees that got screwed out of jobs hold it against the janitor, the 2 year flight attd., the guy or gal they are sitting next to, just because of nasty remarks made by union and management reps.


HELL YES, when Con Carty divulged his bonus package when the employees were about to take massive paycuts, the unions lynched him.

When a union rep (WHO REPRESENTS YOU) does something as criminal as the TWA shove-down, YOU RECALL HIM/HER.

Why ? Because the shove-down doesn't represent how you think the TWA employees should have been treated.

UNTIL WE SEE RECALLS of the union reps, then don't expect the hatred to lessen, infact it will get worse. So, the poor janitor, 2nd yr F/A, etc, they have a voice and they could have told their reps (THAT REPRESENT THEM) that this isn't fair. Being a coward and watching someone's career get wrongfully terminated is just as legitimate a reason to be hated as is career genocide from Greed and Arrogance imparted by the Union reps (THAT RERPRESENT YOU).

Eastern Pilots by Lorenzo
TWA pilots (Kmart Pilots) by AMR/APA

You think you see hatred now, wait till the furloughed employees are called back.

Posts: 66 | From: skooners  |  IP: Logged
love to fly
Junior Poster
Member # 2477

Icon 1 posted      Profile for love to fly         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You sure are the voice of reason! Can't wait to have you back on the property! With comments like you have added to all of these threads you need to step back and take a deep breath. I don't believe anyone at AA treats you the way you look to treat them. Good luck!
Posts: 10  |  IP: Logged
chrispy
Post Captain
Member # 2242

Icon 1 posted      Profile for chrispy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
When I'm told by Ed White-APA Negotiations Chairman-"We screwed you, because we can..you tell me what color roses I should send him.
Then you say, No one at AA treated me badly, lemmie know which planet you're living on. I'll forward you my pink slip after having 8 times as much experience as your 2001 hires.

When you lose you house, career, and insurance because of the above arrogance, your answer is to take a deep breath...haaa. Walk a mile in the shoes of 15 year TWA Capt that got his/her job scabbed by a 2001 hire and I think you'll be singing a diff. tune.

Put your family on one of my planes when I get recalled. I hope they pack extra underwear, it's gonna be a long flight. You recall your union reps, unless you agree with the shove down-your choice, not mine, I'm on unemployment.

I admit, I may not be the voice of reason, but "love to fly", you're certaintly the voice of Willy-APA's Pet Llama.


Try using "Clueless" as your screen name-the shoe fits.

[ 02-09-2004, 00:45: Message edited by: chrispy ]

Posts: 66 | From: skooners  |  IP: Logged
love to fly
Junior Poster
Member # 2477

Icon 1 posted      Profile for love to fly         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Chirpsy,

Your hatred of AA employees is disgusting. You were bought out, purchased, and the seniority integration did not work out the way you wanted. You are in a bad spot.

AA employees do feel bad for your position, but if you and others keep calling us scabs and the like, you will have no sympathy left. The individual AA employee had no control over your plight so stop. Blame management and the unions involved if you need someone to hate.

You will turn this into a situataion that, if you are lucky enough to come back, you will be the scabs because of the vile hatred that you spew. Do you want that? Don't vent your hatred on AA employees who you do not even know.

You have no right to speak ill of the dead pilots who had the misfortune to be involved in an accident. How would your family like it if someone spoke of you that way? Just another example of your irrational and disgusting comments.

No patsy for the APA here, not arrogant either. You are arrogant to expect that you should have everything handed to you when you were bought. Not much of TWA remains now, and from your vile attitude that may be a good thing!

I guess we could all chalk your disgusting comments towards AA employees to your situation which, like I said before, is bad. But, you really have no right to make the comments that you do towards people you do not know. Direct them towards the appropriate management and union leaders please.

Don't threaten me or my family either, very unprofessional! Let me just tell you now that if we ever have the misfortune to fly together, you better get your landings somewhere else because anger like yours will never have the controls of my plane!

Posts: 10  |  IP: Logged
smilinjack
The Big Boss
Member # 7

Icon 1 posted      Profile for smilinjack   Author's Homepage   Email smilinjack   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Chrispy....your digging a hole....knock it off.

Smilin Jack

Posts: 755 | From: Rancho Mirage, Ca.  |  IP: Logged
Bob Ritchie
Post Captain
Member # 1035

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bob Ritchie     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Chrispy,

The last pilot that I knew who spewed forth such anger and hatred(a former OZA capt.) ended up having the FAA pull his medical certificate for life!

Respond as you must: you are a free man, understand however that there are always consequences, either personal,professional or both.

Take care of yourself consider asking for help. It is available.

Bob Ritchie

Posts: 1936 | From: Warren County, Missouri  |  IP: Logged
dave carr
Post Captain
Member # 783

Icon 1 posted      Profile for dave carr   Email dave carr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Chris

Who would have thought that things would turn out the way they have. Those of us with long histories with TWA have really been frustrated by the events of the past few years.

I remember prior to my retirement things looked very bleak for TWA. You were doing special work for managememt trying to find ways to help us out of the woods. You were very positive and enthusiastic in every way and did what you could to rally the troops.

I remember flying to Madrid with you on the 767. You were great with the crew and passengers and a real pleasure to work with. I really enjoyed the time we shared during the flights.

I hope that your angry postings are your way of venting and not indicative of a change in the classy guy that I remember.

Dave Carr

PS How's your dad doing with retirement? Say hello for me.

Posts: 280  |  IP: Logged
PilotDude
Junior Poster
Member # 1457

Icon 1 posted      Profile for PilotDude     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I don't get the TWA folks on this board who are jumping all over Chrispy. And to Bob for suggesting he need help -- I can't believe you would say such a ridiculous thing.

As to the people who left TWA because they saw the "writing on the wall", I have no respect for those people. None. I stuck it out at TWA because I wanted to help TWA succeed, and I wanted to carry my accumulated seniority into a merger if one came along. The pilots who left TWA and are now senior at AA are not deserving of any seniority at all in my eyes.

I know not every AA person is evil. FlyingBrian and SkyGoddess have made very civil posts, and I'm sure they are good people.

However, Chrispy is exactly right. I never thought I would ever see my fellow man treat one another in the disgusting fashion in which AA employees have treated TWA people on the whole. It sickens me to think that people can have such little regard for the careers and lives of their fellow man. The AA work force has stooped to a low I never thought possible.

I hope with all my heart that they get what is coming to them soon. And I know that if they don't get it in this lifetime, they will get it in the next. They certainly have never heard "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

They will get it in the end, and I will be very, very happy to see them suffer. (Yes, I know that is a mean thing to say but I just can't help it. I really feel that way.)

And lastly, I can tell you that AA is the absolute worst company I have ever worked for in my life, and I cannot stand the thought of ever going back to that horrible, horrible place. I loved every minute of my time at TWA. I'd rather work the rest of my life as a Flight Instructor than ever go back to AA.

So, lay off Chrispy.

[ 02-11-2004, 00:28: Message edited by: PilotDude ]

Posts: 11 | From: Olathe, KS  |  IP: Logged
Draginitin
Post Captain
Member # 2324

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Draginitin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Submit a letter of resignation and be done with it. You'll probably feel better to permanently cut ties with AMR. No one should work for a company, and with people that they hate. It's not good for your health or your family.

BTW, at Eagle, it's reported that during their recent furloughee recall due to expansion, only 9 of 100 furloughees wanted to return.

Posts: 31  |  IP: Logged
PilotDude
Junior Poster
Member # 1457

Icon 1 posted      Profile for PilotDude     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I don't work for AMR anymore, as I'm on furlough. And I'm going to do everything in my power to put myself in a financial position so that I never, ever have to go back.

I don't want to waste my life at a crappy company with people who hate me. I never said I hated working with the AA people. They do seem to hate us. And I can assure you I've never said a mean or negative thing to any one of them.

Posts: 11 | From: Olathe, KS  |  IP: Logged
Draginitin
Post Captain
Member # 2324

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Draginitin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
240 more AA furloughs on 1 March instead of the 223 forcast, so you have even more company. Correction to the Eagle numbers . . . 9 of 98 chose to return to AE from furlough.

[ 02-13-2004, 12:15: Message edited by: Draginitin ]

Posts: 31  |  IP: Logged
TWA Fan 1
Post Captain
Member # 1926

Icon 1 posted      Profile for TWA Fan 1   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The difference between the work conditions at TWA and AA is pretty obvious even to passengers.

At TWA, even under the most dire circumstances, I was always treated with the greatest respect and graciousness.

At AA I was ocassionally treated with an outrageous degree of abuse (as I have written in the past) and most often with a cold indifference.

I don't blame the employees but simply the corporate culture which creates the harsh atmosphere that permeates AA. The corporate management is the group that sets the tone, crushing the workers with their arrogance and disrespect, and that negative energy then permeates all the way down the company.

The airline business is a service industry and personally I've never been especially thrilled to fly on the generally tense, impersonal atmosphere of AA.

Although I personally did not experience the christian religion incident, I did experience what I consider a minor form of bigotry when I booked a frequent flyer ticket for my Russian cousin who has a long Russian name.

After I spelled the name out for the AA reservations agent she replied, with obvious contempt in her voice, "some people with names like that, can you believe we ever let them in the country?" I was totally speechless when confronted with that comment and I thought it best to simply move on.

Does anyone out there think that kind of comment is appropriate?

[ 02-15-2004, 17:22: Message edited by: TWA Fan 1 ]

Posts: 400 | From: Brooklyn, NY  |  IP: Logged
dave carr
Post Captain
Member # 783

Icon 1 posted      Profile for dave carr   Email dave carr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
TWA Fan 1

I know that the merge between TWA and AA has been a disaster for many of our great costomers, as well as almost all the ex TWA employees. I retired as a pilot from TWA in 2000 and was teaching in our training center when the AA purchase came to pass. I experienced this transition.

It has been terrible to see what has happened to so many of the ex TWA employees and I'm sure that the culture of AA is very different from that of the old TWA. I read so many negative comments concerning AA and AA service.

I suppose that I'm very fortunate in my experiences with AA and as such should express my appreciation. As a TWA retiree my wife and I travel extensively on AA. We have had nothing but positive experiences and have been treated respectfully in all instances.

I sincerely hope that AA will resolve these customer related problems that you have been suffering. Many thousands of retirees and employees depend upon AA and we would hate to see these problems negatively impact our futures.

Dave Carr

Posts: 280  |  IP: Logged
AAflyingbrian67
Post Captain
Member # 2419

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AAflyingbrian67   Email AAflyingbrian67   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
First of all that women on the phone should be fired! I am sorry that happened to you.

I thing one problem is that AA has gotten too big to handle.

I think People just do not care anymore. At one point I think most employees did care. I am aware that TWA receive many awards. But, so did AA. AA in the past was known as a great airline. New airplanes, great network, and great service. All that has changed. Can it be saved? I am not sure.

Maybe it is too late? There is so much miss trust, anger, fear in the work force. We all know it starts at the top and works it self down.

I have friends that fly for UAL and Delta. It seems that they are having the same problems to one degree or another.

Posts: 48 | From: Miami  |  IP: Logged
TWA Fan 1
Post Captain
Member # 1926

Icon 1 posted      Profile for TWA Fan 1   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Dave & Brian,

I'm not really quite sure why I've often had bad experiences on AA. It's probably just bad luck.

In any case, to my mind, it's such a pity that AA has had a troubled atmosphere because it really affects what is otherwise the absolute gold standard of U.S. carriers.

Many of the posts that I've read from people on Smiling Jack's indicate that they've been very satisfied with the service on AA.

That's great news and let's hope it just keeps getting better and better...

Posts: 400 | From: Brooklyn, NY  |  IP: Logged
chrispy
Post Captain
Member # 2242

Icon 1 posted      Profile for chrispy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Dragin It in ?

Does that mean coming in low at tree top level, in a flat approach atitude ?

Just curious ?

Thx,

Posts: 66 | From: skooners  |  IP: Logged
PilotDude
Junior Poster
Member # 1457

Icon 1 posted      Profile for PilotDude     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Chrispy --

[Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin]

Posts: 11 | From: Olathe, KS  |  IP: Logged
AHP
Post Captain
Member # 1710

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AHP     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Chrispy, time to walk the walk and not just talk the talk. Resign and be done with it. Life is just too too short.
Posts: 80  |  IP: Logged
chrispy
Post Captain
Member # 2242

Icon 1 posted      Profile for chrispy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
AHP, ,I'll resign so you can move up a number, oh wait unless you get hired in 2010 you're senior to me.

Instead of making dope statements, go sell apples. Until you come down from your AArogAAnt throne and wAAlk A mile in my shoes, knock off the 3rd grade comments.

I plan to come back to American and be one of the best, money-saving, efficient employees. Looking for ways to make the airline better, taking full advantage of the 1-800 Turn in your co-worker phone line so I can get paid $50, and anything else management wants me to do.

Why ? Because as most American NAAtive pilots tell me, "I"M JUST LUCKY TO HAVE BEEN FURLOUGEED BY AA". Believe me, I'll remember how lucky I am when I return.

AHP, thanks for AArogant anticdote, I'll look forward to flying with you.

Shame on you.

Posts: 66 | From: skooners  |  IP: Logged



This topic is comprised of pages:  1  2 
 
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | Smilin' Jack's Aviation Directory



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0